SPY vs VT: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
SPY
VT
SPY tracks the S&P 500 IndexVT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
SPY vs VT, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | SPY | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.71% | +12.86% | VT |
| 2025 | +17.72% | +22.43% | VT |
| 2024 | +24.89% | +16.49% | SPY |
| 2023 | +26.18% | +22.02% | SPY |
| 2022 | -18.18% | -18.00% | VT |
| 2021 | +28.73% | +18.27% | SPY |
| 2020 | +18.33% | +16.59% | SPY |
| 2019 | +31.22% | +26.81% | SPY |
| 2018 | -4.57% | -9.76% | SPY |
| 2017 | +21.71% | +24.50% | VT |
| 2016 | +12.00% | +8.50% | SPY |
| 2015 | +1.23% | -1.86% | SPY |
| 2014 | +13.46% | +3.68% | SPY |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +22.94% | SPY |
| 2012 | +15.99% | +17.12% | VT |
| 2011 | +1.89% | -7.51% | SPY |
| 2010 | +15.06% | +13.08% | SPY |
| 2009 | +26.35% | +32.66% | VT |
| 2008 | -36.80% | -33.05% | VT |
| 2007 | +5.15% | — | — |
| 2006 | +15.85% | — | — |
| 2005 | +4.83% | — | — |
| 2004 | +10.70% | — | — |
| 2003 | +28.18% | — | — |
| 2002 | -21.58% | — | — |
| 2001 | -11.76% | — | — |
| 2000 | -9.74% | — | — |
| 1999 | +20.39% | — | — |
| 1998 | +28.69% | — | — |
| 1997 | +33.48% | — | — |
| 1996 | +22.50% | — | — |
| 1995 | +38.05% | — | — |
| 1994 | +0.40% | — | — |
| 1993 | +8.71% | — | — |
SPY vs VT in plain words
SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPY charges 0.0945% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, SPY finished the year ahead 12 times and VT 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,466 in SPY versus $30,414 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: SPY vs VT
| Fact | SPY | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | Vanguard Total World Stock ETF |
| Tracks | S&P 500 Index | FTSE Global All Cap Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.0945% | 0.06% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 22 Jan 1993 | 24 Jun 2008 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in SPY became | What $10,000 in VT became |
How bumpy the ride was: SPY vs VT
These head-to-head figures use only the 4,598 trading days both funds were listed: 26 Jun 2008 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 18.2 years.
VT swung more than SPY: annualised volatility of 19.7% for SPY against 20.4% for VT, with SPY moving 1% or more on 26.4% of trading days and VT on 27.3%. SPY's worst day was -10.94% on 16 Mar 2020; VT's was -12.14% on 15 Oct 2008.
VT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -50.26% from its peak on 26 Jun 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 29 Dec 2010, 21 months after the low; SPY fell -47.17% from its peak on 11 Aug 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Dec 2010, 21 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.95, and they closed in opposite directions on 9.7% of the 4,597 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 29 Oct 2008, when SPY moved -0.73% and VT +7.37%.
| Measure | SPY | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 19.7% | 20.4% |
| Worst day | -10.94% on 16 Mar 2020 | -12.14% on 15 Oct 2008 |
| Best day | +14.52% on 13 Oct 2008 | +13.45% on 13 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 26.4% of days | 27.3% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -47.17% | -50.26% |
| Peak to trough | 11 Aug 2008 → 9 Mar 2009 | 26 Jun 2008 → 9 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 10 Dec 2010 · 21 months | 29 Dec 2010 · 21 months |
Years SPY and VT parted ways
In 7 of the 18 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2021: SPY returned +28.73% and VT +18.27%, a gap of 10.5 points. They rose together in 13 years, fell together in 3 years and went opposite ways in 2 years.
| Year | SPY | VT | Gap (SPY − VT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +24.89% | +16.49% | +8.4 pts |
| 2021 | +28.73% | +18.27% | +10.5 pts |
| 2018 | -4.57% | -9.76% | +5.2 pts |
| 2014 | +13.46% | +3.68% | +9.8 pts |
| 2013 | +32.31% | +22.94% | +9.4 pts |
| 2011 | +1.89% | -7.51% | +9.4 pts |
| 2009 | +26.35% | +32.66% | -6.3 pts |
How often SPY beat VT over any 12 months
Across the 208 rolling 12-month windows since June 2008, measured month-end to month-end, SPY finished ahead in 76.4% of them (159) and VT in 23.6% (49).
$200 a month into each, 2009–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2009 to December 2025 (204 payments, $40,800 in total) would have grown to $161,574 in SPY and $114,121 in VT, leaving SPY $47,453 ahead.
| Outcome | SPY | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $40,800 | $40,800 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $161,574 | $114,121 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$120,774 | +$73,321 |
| Gain in % | +296.02% | +179.71% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is SPY or VT better?
Across the 19 calendar years both funds were trading, SPY finished the year ahead 12 times and VT 7 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $39,466 in SPY versus $30,414 in VT by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between SPY and VT?
SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index while VT follows the FTSE Global All Cap Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. SPY charges 0.0945% a year in running costs and VT charges 0.06% — VT is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, SPY or VT?
VT swung more than SPY: annualised volatility of 19.7% for SPY against 20.4% for VT, with SPY moving 1% or more on 26.4% of trading days and VT on 27.3%. SPY's worst day was -10.94% on 16 Mar 2020; VT's was -12.14% on 15 Oct 2008.
Which had the deeper drawdown, SPY or VT?
VT had the deeper drawdown: it fell -50.26% from its peak on 26 Jun 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 29 Dec 2010, 21 months after the low; SPY fell -47.17% from its peak on 11 Aug 2008 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 10 Dec 2010, 21 months after the low.
How often did SPY beat VT over a 12-month period?
Across the 208 rolling 12-month windows since June 2008, measured month-end to month-end, SPY finished ahead in 76.4% of them (159) and VT in 23.6% (49).
What would $10,000 in SPY have become?
$10,000 invested in SPY at the start of 2016 grew to $39,466 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.7% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.