VUG vs SPHQ: which ETF won each year?

Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexSPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index

What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?

You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.

VUG turned it into
$49,942
+17.45% per year on average · 2016–2025
SPHQ turned it into
$37,666
+14.18% per year on average · 2016–2025
Difference
+$12,276
VUG made more of the same money

VUG vs SPHQ, year by year

Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.

Years compared
22
where both funds were trading
VUG won
13
years
SPHQ won
9
years
YearVUGSPHQWinner
2026 (so far)+11.18%+12.92%SPHQ
2025+19.40%+13.25%VUG
2024+32.69%+25.44%VUG
2023+46.83%+24.83%VUG
2022-33.16%-15.76%SPHQ
2021+27.35%+27.59%SPHQ
2020+40.25%+16.93%VUG
2019+37.03%+33.63%VUG
2018-3.32%-7.09%VUG
2017+27.72%+19.10%VUG
2016+6.27%+14.30%SPHQ
2015+3.24%+1.64%VUG
2014+13.61%+16.08%SPHQ
2013+32.48%+32.73%SPHQ
2012+17.01%+14.32%VUG
2011+1.82%+6.28%SPHQ
2010+17.22%+20.50%SPHQ
2009+36.14%+12.59%VUG
2008-38.02%-46.35%VUG
2007+12.52%+16.77%SPHQ
2006+9.19%+4.58%VUG
2005+5.02%-2.05%VUG
2004+4.99%——

VUG vs SPHQ in plain words

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold.

Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 22 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 13 times and SPHQ 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.

Fund facts: VUG vs SPHQ

FactVUGSPHQ
FundVanguard Growth ETFInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
TracksCRSP US Large Cap Growth IndexS&P 500 Quality Index
Yearly cost (TER)0.03%0.15%
DividendsDistributing — dividends paid outDistributing — dividends paid out
Launched26 Jan 20046 Dec 2005
$10,000 investedWhat $10,000 in VUG becameWhat $10,000 in SPHQ became

How bumpy the ride was: VUG vs SPHQ

These head-to-head figures use only the 5,240 trading days both funds were listed: 6 Dec 2005 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 20.8 years.

VUG swung more than SPHQ: annualised volatility of 20.6% for VUG against 19.2% for SPHQ, with VUG moving 1% or more on 30.6% of trading days and SPHQ on 27.1%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and SPHQ -10.30%.

SPHQ had the deeper drawdown: it fell -57.83% from its peak on 29 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 14 May 2013, 53 months after the low; VUG fell -50.68% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Feb 2011, 22 months after the low.

Day to day the two usually move together: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.89, and they closed in opposite directions on 14.9% of the 5,239 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 21 Jun 2007, when VUG moved +0.65% and SPHQ +7.38%.

MeasureVUGSPHQ
Annualised volatility20.6%19.2%
Worst day-12.62% on 16 Mar 2020-10.30% on 16 Mar 2020
Best day+11.94% on 13 Oct 2008+12.89% on 13 Oct 2008
Days moving 1% or more30.6% of days27.1% of days
Deepest drawdown-50.68%-57.83%
Peak to trough31 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 200929 Oct 2007 → 20 Nov 2008
Back above the old peak8 Feb 2011 · 22 months14 May 2013 · 53 months

Years VUG and SPHQ parted ways

In 10 of the 21 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2009: VUG returned +36.14% and SPHQ +12.59%, a gap of 23.5 points. They rose together in 17 years, fell together in 3 years and went opposite ways in 1 year.

YearVUGSPHQGap (VUG − SPHQ)
2025+19.40%+13.25%+6.1 pts
2024+32.69%+25.44%+7.3 pts
2023+46.83%+24.83%+22.0 pts
2022-33.16%-15.76%-17.4 pts
2020+40.25%+16.93%+23.3 pts
2017+27.72%+19.10%+8.6 pts
2016+6.27%+14.30%-8.0 pts
2009+36.14%+12.59%+23.5 pts
2008-38.02%-46.35%+8.3 pts
2005+5.02%-2.05%+7.1 pts

How often VUG beat SPHQ over any 12 months

Across the 238 rolling 12-month windows since December 2005, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 63.0% of them (150) and SPHQ in 37.0% (88).

12-month windows
238
month-end to month-end, overlapping
VUG ahead
63.0%
150 of 238 windows
SPHQ ahead
37.0%
88 of 238 windows

$200 a month into each, 2006–2025

Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2006 to December 2025 (240 payments, $48,000 in total) would have grown to $280,168 in VUG and $202,349 in SPHQ, leaving VUG $77,820 ahead.

OutcomeVUGSPHQ
Paid in$48,000$48,000
Value at the end of 2025$280,168$202,349
Gain on the money paid in+$232,168+$154,349
Gain in %+483.68%+321.56%

Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.

Frequently asked

Is VUG or SPHQ better?

Across the 22 calendar years both funds were trading, VUG finished the year ahead 13 times and SPHQ 9 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $49,942 in VUG versus $37,666 in SPHQ by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.

What is the difference between VUG and SPHQ?

VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index while SPHQ follows the S&P 500 Quality Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. VUG charges 0.03% a year in running costs and SPHQ charges 0.15% — VUG is the cheaper fund to hold. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.

Which is more volatile, VUG or SPHQ?

VUG swung more than SPHQ: annualised volatility of 20.6% for VUG against 19.2% for SPHQ, with VUG moving 1% or more on 30.6% of trading days and SPHQ on 27.1%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VUG closed -12.62% and SPHQ -10.30%.

Which had the deeper drawdown, VUG or SPHQ?

SPHQ had the deeper drawdown: it fell -57.83% from its peak on 29 Oct 2007 to a low on 20 Nov 2008, then closed back above the old peak on 14 May 2013, 53 months after the low; VUG fell -50.68% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Feb 2011, 22 months after the low.

How often did VUG beat SPHQ over a 12-month period?

Across the 238 rolling 12-month windows since December 2005, measured month-end to month-end, VUG finished ahead in 63.0% of them (150) and SPHQ in 37.0% (88).

What would $10,000 in VUG have become?

$10,000 invested in VUG at the start of 2016 grew to $49,942 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 17.4% per year.

Related comparisons

More head-to-heads featuring VUG or SPHQ.

Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.