VTI vs VUG: which ETF won each year?
Yearly returns side by side, one winner per year — dividends included, priced as you'd actually buy them.
VTI
VUG
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market IndexVUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index
What did the last 10 years do to $10,000?
You invest $10,000 at the start of the window and touch nothing — dividends reinvested, the running year not counted.
VTI vs VUG, year by year
Calendar-year total returns (dividends included) side by side, and who took the crown each year. A dash means the fund did not exist yet.
| Year | VTI | VUG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 (so far) | +12.58% | +11.18% | VTI |
| 2025 | +17.10% | +19.40% | VUG |
| 2024 | +23.81% | +32.69% | VUG |
| 2023 | +26.05% | +46.83% | VUG |
| 2022 | -19.52% | -33.16% | VTI |
| 2021 | +25.68% | +27.35% | VUG |
| 2020 | +21.08% | +40.25% | VUG |
| 2019 | +30.67% | +37.03% | VUG |
| 2018 | -5.23% | -3.32% | VUG |
| 2017 | +21.21% | +27.72% | VUG |
| 2016 | +12.82% | +6.27% | VTI |
| 2015 | +0.36% | +3.24% | VUG |
| 2014 | +12.55% | +13.61% | VUG |
| 2013 | +33.45% | +32.48% | VTI |
| 2012 | +16.45% | +17.01% | VUG |
| 2011 | +0.97% | +1.82% | VUG |
| 2010 | +17.43% | +17.22% | VTI |
| 2009 | +28.90% | +36.14% | VUG |
| 2008 | -36.99% | -38.02% | VTI |
| 2007 | +5.37% | +12.52% | VUG |
| 2006 | +15.70% | +9.19% | VTI |
| 2005 | +6.30% | +5.02% | VTI |
| 2004 | +12.78% | +4.99% | VTI |
| 2003 | +30.74% | — | — |
| 2002 | -20.48% | — | — |
| 2001 | -4.40% | — | — |
VTI vs VUG in plain words
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.03% a year in running costs.
Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically. Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 9 times and VUG 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested.
Fund facts: VTI vs VUG
| Fact | VTI | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard Growth ETF |
| Tracks | CRSP US Total Market Index | CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index |
| Yearly cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Dividends | Distributing — dividends paid out | Distributing — dividends paid out |
| Launched | 24 May 2001 | 26 Jan 2004 |
| $10,000 invested | What $10,000 in VTI became | What $10,000 in VUG became |
How bumpy the ride was: VTI vs VUG
These head-to-head figures use only the 5,707 trading days both funds were listed: 30 Jan 2004 to 6 Oct 2026, roughly 22.6 years.
VUG swung more than VTI: annualised volatility of 18.8% for VTI against 20.0% for VUG, with VTI moving 1% or more on 25.9% of trading days and VUG on 29.3%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VTI closed -11.38% and VUG -12.62%.
VTI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -55.45% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low; VUG fell -50.68% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Feb 2011, 22 months after the low.
Day to day the two move almost in lockstep: the correlation of their daily returns is 0.96, and they closed in opposite directions on 9.8% of the 5,706 days measured. The widest single-day gap came on 9 Nov 2020, when VTI moved +1.19% and VUG -1.54%.
| Measure | VTI | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Annualised volatility | 18.8% | 20.0% |
| Worst day | -11.38% on 16 Mar 2020 | -12.62% on 16 Mar 2020 |
| Best day | +12.83% on 13 Oct 2008 | +11.94% on 13 Oct 2008 |
| Days moving 1% or more | 25.9% of days | 29.3% of days |
| Deepest drawdown | -55.45% | -50.68% |
| Peak to trough | 9 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009 | 31 Oct 2007 → 9 Mar 2009 |
| Back above the old peak | 13 Mar 2012 · 36 months | 8 Feb 2011 · 22 months |
Years VTI and VUG parted ways
In 11 of the 22 completed calendar years both funds were trading, the two returns ended more than 5 points apart. The widest split was 2023: VTI returned +26.05% and VUG +46.83%, a gap of 20.8 points. They rose together in 19 years and fell together in 3 years.
| Year | VTI | VUG | Gap (VTI − VUG) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +23.81% | +32.69% | -8.9 pts |
| 2023 | +26.05% | +46.83% | -20.8 pts |
| 2022 | -19.52% | -33.16% | +13.6 pts |
| 2020 | +21.08% | +40.25% | -19.2 pts |
| 2019 | +30.67% | +37.03% | -6.4 pts |
| 2017 | +21.21% | +27.72% | -6.5 pts |
| 2016 | +12.82% | +6.27% | +6.5 pts |
| 2009 | +28.90% | +36.14% | -7.2 pts |
| 2007 | +5.37% | +12.52% | -7.1 pts |
| 2006 | +15.70% | +9.19% | +6.5 pts |
| 2004 | +12.78% | +4.99% | +7.8 pts |
How often VTI beat VUG over any 12 months
Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, VTI finished ahead in 36.0% of them (94) and VUG in 64.0% (167).
$200 a month into each, 2005–2025
Putting $200 into each fund at the start of every month from January 2005 to December 2025 (252 payments, $50,400 in total) would have grown to $226,239 in VTI and $308,579 in VUG, leaving VUG $82,340 ahead.
| Outcome | VTI | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid in | $50,400 | $50,400 |
| Value at the end of 2025 | $226,239 | $308,579 |
| Gain on the money paid in | +$175,839 | +$258,179 |
| Gain in % | +348.89% | +512.26% |
Each payment rides the return of the month it lands in, dividends reinvested. Only calendar years with all twelve months of data for both funds count, so the plan may start later than the shared history.
Frequently asked
Is VTI or VUG better?
Across the 23 calendar years both funds were trading, VTI finished the year ahead 9 times and VUG 14 times. $10,000 invested at the start of 2016 was worth $37,896 in VTI versus $49,942 in VUG by the end of 2025, dividends reinvested. Past returns don't promise future ones — but this is what actually happened.
What is the difference between VTI and VUG?
VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while VUG follows the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, so they own different slices of the market and their years can look very different. Both funds charge 0.03% a year in running costs. Both funds distribute: dividends land in your account as cash instead of being reinvested automatically.
Which is more volatile, VTI or VUG?
VUG swung more than VTI: annualised volatility of 18.8% for VTI against 20.0% for VUG, with VTI moving 1% or more on 25.9% of trading days and VUG on 29.3%. Both had their worst day on 16 Mar 2020: VTI closed -11.38% and VUG -12.62%.
Which had the deeper drawdown, VTI or VUG?
VTI had the deeper drawdown: it fell -55.45% from its peak on 9 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 13 Mar 2012, 36 months after the low; VUG fell -50.68% from its peak on 31 Oct 2007 to a low on 9 Mar 2009, then closed back above the old peak on 8 Feb 2011, 22 months after the low.
How often did VTI beat VUG over a 12-month period?
Across the 261 rolling 12-month windows since January 2004, measured month-end to month-end, VTI finished ahead in 36.0% of them (94) and VUG in 64.0% (167).
What would $10,000 in VTI have become?
$10,000 invested in VTI at the start of 2016 grew to $37,896 by the end of 2025, with dividends reinvested — an average of 14.3% per year.
Source: Yahoo Finance daily adjusted closes for the US primary listings, dividends reinvested. Prices through · refreshed 7 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC. How every number is calculated.